Criminal justice system should pull up its socks
A large number of lawbreakers—most of whom should be in prison—will be running for elective positions in the August 9 election. It goes without saying that although they ought to be barred from public office, some will emerge as our next set of leaders and will be in charge of running public affairs for the next five years.
A considerable number are corrupt and have brazenly looted public coffers, diverting tax money from State corporations, counties, or government ministries and agencies. Many others have dubious academic credentials, and this notwithstanding, they will be the custodians of law, order, and ethics if they win whether at the grassroots level or in higher national offices.
That they will be on the ballot has been made possible by the failure of the handlers of our criminal justice system. The situation would not have been so serious as it is now had the offices mandated with the task to tame these crimes executed their mandates meticulously and with commitment and diligence.
Unfortunate as the scenario is, it must go on record that the offices of Director of Criminal Investigations (DCI), Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC), Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), National Cohesion and Integration Commission (NCIC) and the Judiciary have failed Kenyans. They should raise their game to raise the bar in future elections by using their shortcomings now as learning points.
Also standing indicted are the Public Accounts Committee and the Public Investments Committee of the 12th Parliament, which have abetted cover-up of graft cases either of their own accord or because they were emasculated. Now that the life of the 12th Parliament has come to an end, the electorate should take the bold move of electing people of integrity to ensure that the next Parliament will be composed of more people-centred, dignified and reasonable representatives who will put the interests of the country first when handling of public affairs.
Once Kenya has a new administration in place, the citizenry should demand that holders of various appointive offices are given clear targets and put to task to deliver on their core mandates without fear or favour so that we can bring order and respect for the rule of law in public service. Many have performed far below expectations. Can they start working now on their own will before the public ups the ante? That is our only challenge to them.
