History made as judge delivers 17 rulings in two hours

Friday, April 10th, 2020 14:54 | By
Court blocks Transcentury takeover bid
Court hammer. PHOTO/Courtesy

By Alphonce Mung'ahu

Despite temporary suspension of judicial proceedings, Employment and Labour Relations Court judge Byram Ongaya on Thursday delivered a total of 17 judgments and rulings in about two hours.

Three out of the 17 judgments were rulings which justice Ongaya delivered at the Milimani Labour Court . 

In one of the rulings, the judge reinstated Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH) nurse Stephen  Kaburia Rutere who had been wrongfully interdicted  six years ago.

In his judgement, justice Ongaya said Rutere who was nursing officer 111 at KNH was wrongfully interdicted by Human Resources Manager Justus Kimaathi Bui for allegedly inciting his other workers to join strike.

He said the decision was unlawful as the board was not involved in the action.

"Bui had no mandate to take such action against Rutere since it was only the hospital board which had the mandate to interdict him," said the judge.

When Chief Justice (CJ) David Maraga took office in October 2016 and promised to clear the case backlog saying that, by the end of his tenure in December 2020, there will be no case in court older than three years.

But as at the end of the last financial year, the backlog stood at 341,056 cases according to a government report, and the pile-up of cases is likely to continue after the courts shut down operations for one month following the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic.

At least 20 tribunals under the judiciary have also scaled down operations.

The Co-operative Tribunal has suspended fresh filings while the Transport Licensing Appeals Board has postponed cases.

This is on top of the budget cuts and the few number of judges and magistrates.

Some lawyers said the CJ is unlikely to achieve his agenda on the case backlogs due to the suspension of the courts, whose duration remains uncertain.

They said that a case is classified as backlogged if it remains unresolved one year upon its filing in a court. 

The suspension of the courts will not only affect the clearance of cases but also revenue streams such as fines, fees, forfeitures and other charges.

In the three financial years that Justice Maraga has been in office, the judiciary’s total revenue has increased from Sh1.97 billion in Financial Year (FY) 2016/2017 to Sh2.075 billion (FY2017/2018). It further increased to Sh2.69 billion in FY2018/2019.

They said that when the one-month suspension will be coming to an end, the judges will be starting their Easter recess.

This means that normal operations could resume in  the next three months.

The lawyers said that some cases have a ripple effect on the economy. With their conclusion delayed, the economy will feel the heat.

 Shortly after taking office, as at December of that year there were a total of 505,315 cases pending in the court system. Of these, 360,284 were pending for five years or longer.

While outlining his ‘six strategic big bets’ to back his vision for the Judiciary, CJ listed clearance of case backlog as the second from top after enhancing access to justice.

Third on the agenda was dealing with corruption and handling of complaints.

He introduced service weeks, circuit courts and mobile courts and highlighted the Case Clearance Rate (CCR) as a key measure of performance indicators for judges and magistrates.

The CCR is the rate of resolution of cases measured by the percentage of resolved cases against filed cases within a specified period.

Productivity refers to the number of resolved cases in each court divided by number of judges and/or judicial officers in that court.

At the end of FY2018/19, a total of 186,716 cases of more than five years had been cleared in all courts.

However, the report indicates, a total of 39,781 cases that had stayed in courts for over five years remained unresolved by the end of June 2019. A total of 2,521 cases were resolved by tribunals, impacting on reduction of case backlog and consequently enhancing access to justice.

At the end of the period under review, the highest case backlogs were at the Magistrate’s Court and High Court at 245,268 and 63,443 cases, respectively.

More on News